FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2026
Beyond the headline
FORMATIVESPACES.COM

Kentucky Board to Vote on Overhauled School Accountability Regulation Oct. 7-8

The second reading of amendments to 703 KAR 5:270 implements HB 257, replacing year-over-year change scores with individual student growth and swapping climate surveys for chronic absenteeism.

A large, ornate neoclassical building with a prominent dome and columns stands under a clear blue sky. The building is surrounded by green grass and some shrubbery in the foreground.
The Kentucky State Capitol complex. Shown for state policy context. Photo: Daderot / Wikimedia Commons. CC0. Resized for display; social preview adds branding.

The Kentucky Board of Education is scheduled to hear the second reading of proposed amendments to regulation 703 KAR 5:270 on October 7-8, following a September 29 recommendation for approval from the Local Superintendents Advisory Council. The revisions put into effect House Bill 257, signed into law on April 13, 2026, which overhauls the state's school accountability system starting in the 2026-2027 school year.

HB 257 amends KRS 158.6453 and 158.6455 to replace the current accountability system, which evaluates six indicators for both Status (current year performance) and Change (year-over-year difference). Under the new system, schools will receive a single Overall Accountability Score based on updated indicator weights. Schools will no longer receive separate Status and Change scores or performance labels such as "Very High" or "Decreased," according to the Kentucky Department of Education.

What changes under the new system

The law makes several specific changes to the indicators used in accountability. It replaces year-over-year indicator change scores with measures of individual student growth in reading and mathematics. It swaps the existing Quality of School Climate and Safety indicator for a measure of student engagement as tracked by chronic absenteeism. The law also eliminates on-demand writing assessments that had been administered in grades 5, 8, and 11, and increases the weight of high school graduation rates in the overall score.

100 days or moreThe minimum enrollment threshold recommended by LSAC for a student's attendance to count toward a school's chronic absenteeism metric. [5]

The Local Superintendents Advisory Council recommended using 100 days or more of enrollment as the threshold for tracking chronic absenteeism, meaning a student must be enrolled for at least 100 days before their attendance is factored into a school or district's accountability. Chronic absenteeism is defined by KRS 158.6455 as missing 10 percent or more of yearly school time for excused or unexcused reasons.

Most advisory groups consulted by the Kentucky Department of Education recommended a low weight percentage for chronic absenteeism, noting factors beyond schools' control. Those same groups were, in the department's account, overwhelmingly supportive of using a growth value table model for individual student growth in reading and mathematics.

Advisory input and next steps

LSAC members at the September 29 meeting also recommended adjusting the proposal to give more weight to the high school graduation rate indicator, a change proposed by the School Curriculum, Assessment and Accountability Council. The council's recommendations are now before the state board for the second reading of the regulation.

After the second reading, the regulation enters a public comment period. The new accountability system will produce its first public reporting of data from the 2026-2027 school year in fall 2027. Percentile cut scores for color-coded performance levels will be determined through a standard-setting process involving educators and national psychometric experts in summer 2027. Those cut scores must be approved by the Local Superintendents Advisory Council and the Kentucky Department of Education, and they are set to remain in place for six years.

Targeted quality measures — including teacher credential percentages, 8th-grade high school credit attainment, and FAFSA completion — will be reported on the School Report Card until June 2030. After that date, they will become a state accountability indicator with a cumulative weight of no less than 5 percent, as required by the enacted bill text.

Analysis

By the Formative Spaces Newsroom, written after the reporting above was filed.

Chronic absenteeism in accountability is not new. Thirty-six states already do it.

Kentucky is joining at least 36 states that already fold chronic absenteeism into school accountability under ESSA. The path is well worn and so are its pitfalls. Researchers warn that once attendance figures affect school ratings, schools can game the numbers by marking absent students present or discouraging sick children from staying home. Kentucky's own advisory groups pushed for a low weight on chronic absenteeism, citing factors beyond school control. The weight has not yet been set, and wherever it lands, the gaming incentive travels with it.

The real overhaul is eliminating change scores, which are half the current system.

Under the current system, each indicator gets a Status score and a Change score, weighted equally. Change measures whether this year's cohort outperformed last year's, not whether individual students grew. That makes change roughly half of every school's current rating. HB 257 eliminates all change scores and replaces them with individual student growth in reading and math. The chronic absenteeism swap dominates the discussion, but it replaces an indicator worth just 4 percent. The change-score elimination is the bigger story by an order of magnitude.

The 100-day enrollment rule creates a blind spot for transient students.

A student must be enrolled for at least 100 days before their attendance counts toward a school's chronic absenteeism metric. For schools serving highly mobile families, foster children, or students in housing instability, many arrive mid-year and will not clear that bar. Their absenteeism will not factor into the school's accountability score in either direction. This shields schools from penalties for students they barely had time to serve. It also means the schools most affected by chronic absence could show the least complete picture of it in their published ratings.

Sources

  1. Kentucky General Assembly. 26RS HB 257 — Legislative Record View
  2. Kentucky General Assembly. Chapter 138 (HB 257) — Enacted Bill Text View
  3. Kentucky Department of Education. 2026 Legislative Guidance View
  4. Kentucky Board of Education / KSBA. KBE Staff Note — Proposed Amendments to 703 KAR 5:270 View
  5. Kentucky Teacher (KDE). Local Superintendents Advisory Council signs off on second reading of assessment and accountability regulation View
  6. Kentucky Department of Education. HB 257 At A Glance View
  7. Education Commission of the States. 50-State Comparison: School Accountability Systems View
  8. Policy Analysis for California Education (Gottfried). Addressing Absenteeism: Lessons for Policy and Practice View
  9. The 74 Million. How States Try (and Sometimes Fail) to Combat Attendance Gaming and Errors as ESSA Ratchets Up the Stakes View
  10. Kentucky Department of Education. Kentucky School Classification Accuracy (Report No. 051, 2025) View
  11. Kentucky General Assembly. 703 KAR 5:270 — Kentucky's Accountability System (Regulation Text) View