FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2026
Beyond the headline
FORMATIVESPACES.COM

Washington governor proposes statewide school-day phone restriction

The October 2 proposal would require secure device storage starting in 2027-28, with medical and disability exceptions, parent-contact procedures and limits on first-year discipline.

An aerial view shows a large domed building with columns, surrounded by green trees and other institutional buildings. In the far distance, a snow-capped mountain rises above a forested landscape under a partly cloudy sky.
The Washington State Capitol complex. Shown for state policy context. Photo: Nils Huenerfuerst / Wikimedia Commons. CC BY 4.0. Resized for display; social preview adds branding.

Gov. Bob Ferguson released details of his proposed Phone-Free Schools Act at a Spokane event on October 2, 2026. The governor’s office said he plans to prefile the governor-request bill on December 7 for the upcoming legislative session. The proposal would establish a statewide restriction on students’ personal electronic devices throughout the school day, beginning in the 2027-28 school year. It has not yet been enacted.

Storage, exceptions and parent contact

The published draft requires devices to be off and placed in secure, inaccessible storage. Options include district-provided or approved locked pouches, main-office lock boxes, a designated classroom location, or another secure system that prevents student access. Backpacks do not qualify as the designated classroom location.

The restriction covers instructional time and lunch, while excluding extracurricular activities before or after school. It reaches smartphones, smartwatches, tablets and other connected personal devices; school-issued educational equipment and qualifying medical devices are excluded. The draft also applies the policy to charter schools and state-tribal education compact schools.

Exceptions cover documented medical needs, educational or assistive-technology needs specified in an IEP or Section 504 plan when no reasonable alternative exists, and approved access for student caregivers or students whose safety is documented as at risk. Districts would also have to establish procedures for parents and guardians to contact their children during the school day.

For 2027-28, the draft bars suspension or expulsion solely for violating the device policy. It calls for subsequent enforcement to comply with student-discipline and disability law. The draft contains no appropriation for storage equipment. Its effective-date clause is July 1, 2027; the school-policy requirement begins with the following school year.

How the proposal changes current law

Washington’s current law, Substitute Senate Bill 5346, was approved on March 25, 2026. It permits school boards to adopt mobile-device restrictions and encourages them to consider state recommendations; it does not impose Ferguson’s proposed full-day mandate. The law expresses a goal of enabling every district to implement a bell-to-bell cellphone policy suited to its community by 2030.

That law also directs the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to report to the Legislature by December 15, 2027, on school policies, implementation barriers and evidence-based recommendations. Ferguson’s proposal would move from local permission toward a mandatory statewide minimum, with districts choosing storage and contact procedures within the statutory requirements.

A national policy shift

The governor’s October 2 announcement said at least 31 states and the District of Columbia restrict student cellphone use in schools, including 22 states with restrictions throughout the school day. It attributed those counts to Education Week. The announcement argued that a statewide rule would reduce classroom distractions and strengthen student engagement.

New York offers one example of how a state has addressed implementation costs. Its governor’s office says the FY2026 budget provided $13.5 million for storage solutions as part of New York’s school-day cellphone restrictions. New York’s guidance requires adequate on-site storage and says backpacks do not meet that requirement. Washington’s published draft proposes storage requirements without a corresponding funding provision.

Analysis

By the Formative Spaces Newsroom, written after the reporting above was filed.

The mandate requires secure storage but provides zero dollars for it

The bill mandates secure storage but allocates no money for it. Washington enrolls about 1.1 million public-school students. The leading storage solution, Yondr magnetic pouches, runs $25 to $30 per student, putting full coverage near $30 million. New York, which the governor's announcement cites as a model, backed its own phone law with $13.5 million. Districts can choose cheaper options, but the mandate arrives with no state funding for any of them.

First-year suspensions rise before any test-score gains appear

Two 2025 studies show what actually happens. The NBER Florida study found suspensions rose in the first year of phone bans, especially among Black students, then dissipated. Test-score gains appeared only in year two, about 0.6 percentiles in high-activity schools. A Stanford nationwide study of lockable pouches found average test-score effects consistently close to zero, with modest high school gains offset by small negative middle school effects. First-year disruption is documented, not speculative.

Ferguson adds an unfunded mandate while cutting K-12 spending

Ferguson is proposing this unfunded requirement while presiding over $90 million in K-12 cuts. The Washington State PTA reports a 35 percent reduction to Transition to Kindergarten slots and further cuts to levy equalization. Superintendent Chris Reykdal says the legislature does not intend to fully fund K-12 education. The Seattle Times notes Ferguson campaigned on equitable school funding but has not delivered. A phone mandate without money lands in districts already cutting.

Sources

  1. Lynnwood Times. Ferguson details his Phone-Free Schools Act, a full-day ban on cellphones in schools View
  2. Washington State Legislature. SB 5346 – Substitute Senate Bill 5346 as passed (Session Law) View
  3. Washington Governor’s Office. Governor Ferguson launches Phone-Free Schools Act at Spokane event (October 2, 2026) View
  4. Harvard Kennedy School. Many states are banning cellphones in schools. Is it working? View
  5. New York Governor's Office. New York State Phone-Free Schools Law View
  6. Ballotpedia. State policies on cellphone use in K-12 public schools View
  7. Alabama Legislature. HB166 Enrolled — Wireless communication devices in schools View
  8. Washington Governor’s Office / Code Reviser’s Office. Phone-Free Schools Act proposal, Z-0040.3/27, third draft, sections 2-5 View
  9. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cellphone Bans in Schools: Effects on Test Scores, Suspensions, and Absences (Working Paper 34388) View
  10. Stanford University. The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches View
  11. NBC News. Schools spend millions on Yondr pouches to store cellphones View
  12. The Seattle Times. Gov. Ferguson's free lunch program, like rest of education plan, misses View
  13. Washington State PTA. Week 9: Legislature Adjourns, Cuts $90 million from K-12 Education View
  14. WA K12 Academic Atlas. Washington lost 8,000 public-school students this year, and 16 schools closed View
  15. Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Reykdal: Budget Proposals Confirm Legislature does not Intend to Fully Fund K-12 Education View