AI in Schools / State report
Tennessee separates local AI policy and teacher-training deadlines
Districts and charter governing bodies needed AI-use policies by 2024–25. Specified grades 6–12 teachers need training by August 1, 2028, or within two years of licensure if later.
Published
Research as of · Sources & Notes
Current law or policy
State law and guidance
Tennessee Public Chapter 550 requires district boards and charter governing bodies to adopt AI-use policies for students, teachers and staff, implemented by the 2024-25 school year. A separate Public Chapter 1056 requires teachers of grades six through 12 to complete specified AI professional development by August 1, 2028, or within two years of licensure if later. Students and families need the existing local assignment rule; educators should check both it and their training timetable; leaders should not substitute a proposed student-literacy bill for enacted requirements. [27][25][31]
Which Tennessee requirement applies to which audience?
Tennessee sets separate deadlines for local policy and teacher training
Existing policy adoption and later teacher professional development have different subjects and dates.
Tennessee sets separate deadlines for local policy and teacher training. Existing policy adoption and later teacher professional development have different subjects and dates. Public Chapter 550. Audience: Students, teachers and staff. Requirement: District boards and charter governing bodies adopt AI-use policies. Timing: Implemented by the 2024-25 school year. Evidence state: operative. Public Chapter 1056. Audience: Teachers of grades 6–12. Requirement: Complete the specified AI professional development. Timing: By August 1, 2028, or within two years of licensure if later. Evidence state: enacted future deadline.
| Jurisdiction or item | Audience | Requirement | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
Public Chapter 550Current law or policySource notesSource notes [27] | Students, teachers and staff | District boards and charter governing bodies adopt AI-use policies. | Implemented by the 2024-25 school year. |
Public Chapter 1056Enacted law · future deadlineSource notesSource notes [25] | Teachers of grades 6–12 | Complete the specified AI professional development. | By August 1, 2028, or within two years of licensure if later. |
View data and source notes
| Item | Audience | Requirement | Timing | Status | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Chapter 550 | Students, teachers and staff | District boards and charter governing bodies adopt AI-use policies. | Implemented by the 2024-25 school year. | operative | [27] |
| Public Chapter 1056 | Teachers of grades 6–12 | Complete the specified AI professional development. | By August 1, 2028, or within two years of licensure if later. | enacted_future_deadline | [25] |
Sources & Notes
This report reflects research as of October 6, 2026. Reference numbers link to the cited publications.
The August tracker counts describe its historical snapshot. The reviewed policy database has a separate scope and release date. Neither is a census of classroom AI use.
- f / Jpublications.tnsosfiles.com
- Slniepublications.tnsosfiles.com
- Bill Information - Tennessee General Assemblywapp.capitol.tn.gov
Share this report
Download a branded preview or share the report link.
Related reporting
California law bars ed-tech use of student data for AI training, extends privacy rules to colleges
AB 1159 prohibits companies from using identifiable student information to train generative AI and broadens California's school privacy laws to cover higher education, closing a loophole that let general platforms escape regulation.
Massachusetts Graduation Council Recommends AI Literacy as Required Milestone
Final advisory report filed June 2026 proposes AI and digital literacy module within career-planning framework; legislative action still needed before any class graduates under new standards.
LAUSD bars student generative AI on district devices for 2026-27, surprising board and parents
The nation's second-largest school district imposed a moratorium on student access to generative AI tools, affecting 378,000 students. The move was disclosed at a committee meeting without a board vote, as the district studies how to regulate the technology.