Research files / K–12 policy
AI in Schools
Compare official AI policies for students, families and schools.
Reviewed file · October 6, 2026 Sources & Notes
The Visual Edition
School AI rules in charts
Compare student use, family notice and legal deadlines in 16 charts. Read the official sources. Download and share branded graphics.
New research reports
Who Sets the Rules for Classroom AI
State law, district approval and teacher permission can set separate limits on classroom AI. Family choices and human-review requirements also vary.
Find a policy
2 matching documents
Current documents & guidance · Illinois. Clear all filters
Result sources
Sources establish adoption. They do not identify a separate exact effective date. The policy’s general consent rules for communication do not establish a universal parent-consent requirement for AI.
- Student Acceptable Use | Chicago Public Schools: https://www.cps.edu/sites/cps-policy-rules/policies/600/604/604-2 · V. Student Use — Artificial Intelligence. Checked October 6, 2026
The statute requires agency guidance, not AI use by every student or district. The statutory deadline alone does not establish whether the agency published the guidance on time.
- Illinois General Assembly - 105 ILCS 5/ School Code.: https://ilga.gov/legislation/ILCS/details?ActID=1005&ActName=School+Code.&ChapAct=105+ILCS+5%2F&Chapter=&ChapterID=17&MajorTopic=&SeqEnd=40299218&SeqStart=14200000 · 105 ILCS 5/2-3.118a(a). Checked October 6, 2026
Release 2026-10-06-875e416b4116. This printout includes the current result page and any selected comparison.
Sources & Notes
How to read this file
Each row describes one official law, policy, model or guidance document. Related provisions appear together. State models and guidance can require local adoption. Proposals do not establish enacted requirements. Each record includes status, dates, scope and exceptions.
The default view shows adopted policies, current published documents and guidance. Future enacted changes, proposals, and historical bills have separate views.
Source numbers link to the official publication and the relevant section. Each source includes an excerpt, a text fingerprint and a review date.
What this file covers
This release contains 24 reviewed instruments: 3 federal instruments, documents from 15 state jurisdictions, and policies or guidance from 3 district governance units. Counts show records in this file. They do not measure national adoption.
Research coverage is partial. We did not search every state or district. A missing record does not show whether AI use is allowed or prohibited. We give an exact start date only when a source establishes it.
New York City covers several local education agencies (LEAs). It has no single NCES district ID in this file. Other pilot districts use the 2025–2026 directory from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
Coverage by state and district pilot
- AlabamaNot yet included
- Alaska1 published policy documents. Partial review
- ArizonaNot yet included
- ArkansasNot yet included
- California3 published policy documents. Partial review
- ColoradoNot yet included
- Connecticut1 published policy documents. Partial review
- DelawareNot yet included
- District of Columbia1 published policy documents. Partial review
- Florida2 published policy documents. Partial review
- GeorgiaNot yet included
- HawaiiNot yet included
- IdahoNot yet included
- Illinois1 published policy documents. Partial review
- IndianaNot yet included
- IowaNot yet included
- KansasNot yet included
- KentuckyNot yet included
- Louisiana1 published policy documents. Partial review
- MaineNot yet included
- MarylandNot yet included
- MassachusettsNot yet included
- MichiganNot yet included
- MinnesotaNot yet included
- MississippiNot yet included
- MissouriNot yet included
- Montana1 published policy documents. Partial review
- NebraskaNot yet included
- NevadaNot yet included
- New HampshireNot yet included
- New JerseyNot yet included
- New MexicoNot yet included
- New YorkNot yet included
- North CarolinaNot yet included
- North Dakota1 published policy documents. Partial review
- OhioNot yet included
- Oklahoma1 published policy documents. Partial review
- Oregon1 published policy documents. Partial review
- PennsylvaniaNot yet included
- Rhode Island1 published policy documents. Partial review
- South CarolinaNot yet included
- South DakotaNot yet included
- TennesseeNot yet included
- TexasNot yet included
- UtahNot yet included
- VermontNot yet included
- VirginiaNot yet included
- Washington1 published policy documents. Partial review
- West Virginia1 published policy documents. Partial review
- WisconsinNot yet included
- Wyoming1 published policy documents. Partial review
District pilot
- New York City Public Schools, New York · Published document reviewed
- Chicago Public Schools, Illinois · Published document reviewed. NCES 1709930 (2025-2026)
- Fairfax County Public Schools, Virginia · Published document reviewed. NCES 5101260 (2025-2026)
- Los Angeles Unified School District, California · Current policy not yet included. NCES 0622710 (2025-2026)
- Houston Independent School District, Texas · Current policy not yet included. NCES 4823640 (2025-2026)
- Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Florida · Current policy not yet included. NCES 1200390 (2025-2026)
Release 2026-10-06-875e416b4116. Each record shows its latest source check. A failed source check does not change a published finding or its review date. Public summaries and provision references are available below. Raw evidence copies and private review files remain private.
Public policy summaries & provision references (JSON) · This published release. Structured data preserves scope, dates, exceptions and source locations.
Related reporting
California law bars ed-tech use of student data for AI training, extends privacy rules to colleges
AB 1159 prohibits companies from using identifiable student information to train generative AI and broadens California's school privacy laws to cover higher education, closing a loophole that let general platforms escape regulation.
Massachusetts Graduation Council Recommends AI Literacy as Required Milestone
Final advisory report filed June 2026 proposes AI and digital literacy module within career-planning framework; legislative action still needed before any class graduates under new standards.
LAUSD bars student generative AI on district devices for 2026-27, surprising board and parents
The nation's second-largest school district imposed a moratorium on student access to generative AI tools, affecting 378,000 students. The move was disclosed at a committee meeting without a board vote, as the district studies how to regulate the technology.