Formative Spaces
The Newsroom
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2026
Beyond the headline
FORMATIVESPACES.COM

Research files / K–12 policy

AI in Schools

Compare official AI policies for students, families and schools.

Reviewed file · October 6, 2026 Sources & Notes

The Visual Edition

School AI rules in charts

Compare student use, family notice and legal deadlines in 16 charts. Read the official sources. Download and share branded graphics.

Open the visual edition →

New research reports

Who Sets the Rules for Classroom AI

State law, district approval and teacher permission can set separate limits on classroom AI. Family choices and human-review requirements also vary.

Find a policy

More filters

Date filters use exact start dates that official sources establish. They exclude dates given only as a month or school year, and dates the source does not specify.

Reset

2 matching documents

Current documents & guidance · California. Clear all filters

Official AI policy instruments, including scope, document status, timing, and links to sources
Place & authorityWhat it saysWho / what it coversStatus & timingDetails
CaliforniaCalifornia Department of EducationModel policy: artificial intelligence in education

California offers an optional model policy for local adoption, including student-data safeguards and disclosure of AI use.

Local school boards, educators, and students considering district policy. The model itself is optional.

GuidanceCurrent model checked October 6, 2026Read record: Model policy: artificial intelligence in education, California →
CaliforniaCalifornia LegislatureAI literacy in curriculum-framework review

California requires the Instructional Quality Commission to consider AI literacy in specified framework revisions and instructional-material reviews.

The duty covers the Instructional Quality Commission’s mathematics, science, and history-social science frameworks and materials. It applies at the next specified revisions or adoptions after January 1, 2025.

Enacted lawThe law was chaptered September 29, 2024. The duty depends on the specified revisions or adoptions.Read record: AI literacy in curriculum-framework review, California →

Compare one question

Select 2–4 documents. The comparison uses the same topic, actor, grade, use, and date filters for each.

Result sources

California: Model policy: artificial intelligence in education

A district may adopt its own binding policy. This state model does not prove that every district has adopted it.

  1. Model Policy: Artificial Intelligence In Education - Professional Learning (CA Dept of Education): https://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/pl/aipolicy.asp · Introduction. Checked October 6, 2026
California: AI literacy in curriculum-framework review

The duty requires consideration of content in the specified state review processes. It does not require every student to take an AI course. We verified the chaptered text in the official browser. Retained evidence is a labeled excerpt. It does not contain the original HTTP bytes.

  1. AB 2876, Chapter 927, September 29, 2024: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2876 · Education Code §33548(d)(1). Checked October 6, 2026

Release 2026-10-06-875e416b4116. This printout includes the current result page and any selected comparison.

Sources & Notes

How to read this file

Each row describes one official law, policy, model or guidance document. Related provisions appear together. State models and guidance can require local adoption. Proposals do not establish enacted requirements. Each record includes status, dates, scope and exceptions.

The default view shows adopted policies, current published documents and guidance. Future enacted changes, proposals, and historical bills have separate views.

Source numbers link to the official publication and the relevant section. Each source includes an excerpt, a text fingerprint and a review date.

What this file covers

This release contains 24 reviewed instruments: 3 federal instruments, documents from 15 state jurisdictions, and policies or guidance from 3 district governance units. Counts show records in this file. They do not measure national adoption.

Research coverage is partial. We did not search every state or district. A missing record does not show whether AI use is allowed or prohibited. We give an exact start date only when a source establishes it.

New York City covers several local education agencies (LEAs). It has no single NCES district ID in this file. Other pilot districts use the 2025–2026 directory from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).

Coverage by state and district pilot

District pilot

Release 2026-10-06-875e416b4116. Each record shows its latest source check. A failed source check does not change a published finding or its review date. Public summaries and provision references are available below. Raw evidence copies and private review files remain private.

Public policy summaries & provision references (JSON) · This published release. Structured data preserves scope, dates, exceptions and source locations.

Related reporting

Explore Formative Spaces research →

Looking for courses or programs? Explore AI learning resources for students →