AI in Schools / The Visual Edition / Story 03
11 current documents address local AI policy development
Local policy development appears in 11 current documents, student data in 9, and tool approval in 7.
Formative Spaces · Research reviewed October 6, 2026
Key findings
The reviewed claims address local policy development, student privacy and tool approval alongside student use.
A document can appear in several rows. A topic missing from this file may still appear in the source document. The counts cannot measure national prevalence or rank policy strength.
Animated chart
Eight-second animation
The animation shows the same data as the chart. Use the controls to play, pause or expand the video.
Download and share
Each download includes the Formative Spaces name, brandmark and source context. Share the complete graphic. Include a link to this story. Site terms apply. Original policy sources retain their own rights.
Still graphics
Landscape PNG 1200 × 900Square PNG 1080 × 1080Vertical PNG 1080 × 1920Scalable SVG Full graphic
Animations
Landscape MP4 8 seconds · silentVertical MP4 8 seconds · silentAnimated SVG Reduced-motion aware
PNG and MP4 files can be uploaded to social platforms. Available sharing destinations depend on your device and the platform.
Chart data and sources
current records · reference total 21. The chart counts reviewed topics in the 21 current documents. Reviewers selected claims rather than coding every statement in each document.
| Reviewed topic | Current records | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Local policy development | 11 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | Alaska: Strategic framework for K–12 AICalifornia: Model policy: artificial intelligence in educationDistrict of Columbia: LEA AI model policy for staff useIllinois: Statewide school AI guidance dutyMontana: AI in K–12 education guidelines, version 2Oklahoma: Responsible Technology in Schools ActOregon: Generative AI in K–12 classrooms, version 2Rhode Island: AI guidance for local education agenciesUnited States: Generative AI risk management profileWashington: Human-centered AI in schoolsWyoming: Guidance for AI policy developmentProvision references
|
| Student data & AI training | 9 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | California: Model policy: artificial intelligence in educationConnecticut: Guidance on artificial intelligenceFairfax County Public Schools: AI guidance for faculty and staffOregon: Generative AI in K–12 classrooms, version 2United States: COPPA policy statement on education technologyUnited States: Children’s online privacy: 2025 final amendmentsUnited States: Generative AI risk management profileWest Virginia: AI guidance, considerations, and intentions, version 1.2Wyoming: Guidance for AI policy developmentProvision references
|
| Tool approval & procurement | 7 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | District of Columbia: LEA AI model policy for staff useFairfax County Public Schools: AI guidance for faculty and staffLouisiana: Artificial intelligence in Louisiana schoolsMontana: AI in K–12 education guidelines, version 2New York City Public Schools: Student-facing AI and screen-time policyNorth Dakota: K–12 AI guidance frameworkRhode Island: AI guidance for local education agenciesProvision references
|
| Family notice & permission | 6 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | Alaska: Strategic framework for K–12 AIChicago Public Schools: Student Acceptable UseConnecticut: Guidance on artificial intelligenceFairfax County Public Schools: AI guidance for faculty and staffNew York City Public Schools: Student-facing AI and screen-time policyOklahoma: Responsible Technology in Schools ActProvision references
|
| Student use | 5 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | Chicago Public Schools: Student Acceptable UseFairfax County Public Schools: AI guidance for faculty and staffLouisiana: Artificial intelligence in Louisiana schoolsNew York City Public Schools: Student-facing AI and screen-time policyOklahoma: Responsible Technology in Schools ActProvision references
|
| AI literacy | 4 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | California: AI literacy in curriculum-framework reviewChicago Public Schools: Student Acceptable UseNew York City Public Schools: Student-facing AI and screen-time policyNorth Dakota: K–12 AI guidance frameworkProvision references
|
| Human judgment | 3 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | District of Columbia: LEA AI model policy for staff useNew York City Public Schools: Student-facing AI and screen-time policyOklahoma: Responsible Technology in Schools ActProvision references
|
| Academic integrity | 2 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | California: Model policy: artificial intelligence in educationWest Virginia: AI guidance, considerations, and intentions, version 1.2Provision references
|
| Accessibility | 2 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | New York City Public Schools: Student-facing AI and screen-time policyWashington: Human-centered AI in schoolsProvision references
|
| Vendor obligations | 2 current records. Current documents with at least one reviewed claim on this topic. | United States: COPPA policy statement on education technologyUnited States: Children’s online privacy: 2025 final amendmentsProvision references
|
Rows overlap. Do not add their counts. They measure reviewed claims in this file, not all mentions, implementation, importance or effectiveness.
Sources & Notes
- Strategic framework for K–12 AI — official document
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development · Source checked October 6, 2026
- PDF page 3
- PDF page 7
- Model Policy: Artificial Intelligence In Education - Professional Learning (CA Dept of Education)
California Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Introduction
- Privacy by Design
- Plagiarism, Disclosure, & Citation
- AB 2876, Chapter 927, September 29, 2024
California Legislature · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Education Code §33548(d)(1)
- Education Code §33548(d)(2)
- Student Acceptable Use | Chicago Public Schools
Chicago Board of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026
- V. Student Use — Artificial Intelligence
- Purpose
- Purpose
- Guidance on Artificial Intelligence (AI)search
Connecticut Commission for Educational Technology · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Official page text
- Official page text
- LEA AI model policy for staff use — official document
Office of the State Superintendent of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026
- PDF page 6 — How to use the model
- PDF page 10 — Student discipline
- PDF page 14 — Reviewing and grading student work
- PDF page 8 — Requirements for staff use
- Artificial Intelligence Guidance for FCPS Faculty and Staff | Fairfax County Public Schools
Fairfax County Public Schools · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Protect Data and Privacy
- Check AI Tool Approval Before Use
- Communicate Clear Expectations for AI Use
- Communicate Clear Expectations for AI Use
- Illinois General Assembly - 105 ILCS 5/ School Code.
Illinois General Assembly · Source checked October 6, 2026
- 105 ILCS 5/2-3.118a(a)
- §2-3.118a(a), publication deadline
- §2-3.118a(b)
- Artificial intelligence in Louisiana schools — official document
Louisiana Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Academic Integrity — AI-Empowered tier
- AI Technology Evaluation Rubric
- Montana AI Guidelines Version 2 FINAL COPY
Montana Office of Public Instruction · Source checked October 6, 2026
- PDF page 3
- PDF page 5
- Guidance on Artificial Intelligence and Screen Time
New York City Public Schools · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Grades 2K–8: Student-Facing AI Moratorium
- AI and Screen Time Policy Updates
- About Exceptions
- Grades 9–12 — AI Literacy
- Grades 9–12 — Career Readiness
- Grades 9–12: Student-Facing AI Use
- AI Use by Educators and School Staff
- Limited AI Pilots
- North Dakota K-12 AI Guidance Framework | North Dakota Department of Public Instruction
North Dakota Department of Public Instruction · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Official page text
- Official page text
- Responsible Technology in Schools Act — official document
Oklahoma Legislature · Source checked October 6, 2026
- §1(E)(3)
- §1(F)
- §1(G)
- §1(I)
- §1(J)(1)
- Bill Information
Oklahoma Legislature · Source checked October 6, 2026
Official SB 1734 bill history
Reviewed record and version → - Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-12 Classrooms
Oregon Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026
- PDF page 8
- PDF page 3
- AI guidance for local education agencies — official document
Rhode Island Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026
- PDF page 5
- PDF page 5
- Policy Statement of the Federal Trade Commission on Education Technology
Federal Trade Commission · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Prohibition Against Mandatory Collection
- Use Prohibitions
- Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 76 (Tuesday, April 22, 2025)
Federal Trade Commission · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Final regulatory text, §312.10
- Final regulatory text, §312.10
- Final regulatory text, §312.10
- Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile
National Institute of Standards and Technology · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Introduction
- Data Privacy risk
- Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in Schools
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction · Source checked October 6, 2026
- Official page text
- Official page text
- AI guidance, considerations, and intentions, version 1.2 — official document
West Virginia Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026
- PDF page 14
- PDF page 24
- Guidance for AI Policy Development
Wyoming Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026
- PDF page 1
- PDF page 4
Release and evidence identity
Research release 2026-10-06-875e416b4116. Headlines and comparisons use this reviewed release. A changed record requires a new editorial review.
Source projection SHA-256: 9cd6a4996022129f1a1a1060c399a65f12c8f18bc7774fea67463c4d0dd981eb
- alaska-ai-framework / state_AK:
89430576ac041627992a5273389f9f416233ab2cdd8683b90f0e85b353b76fba - california-ai-model-policy / q2:
e8cd3d0f08300251a66f19f51dacb8e5df8c52b618182e95e62d4c39d8f9197a - california-ab2876 / ca2876_dom:
d08021faffadfd585602c6071a65a91e9e32f8bd8e146a36816397f3a8c65cf4 - chicago-student-acceptable-use / q14:
0bc94b24b21ddd1237c6355021901d774f301ae730fa81b69d2ec033789a881d - connecticut-ai-guidance / state_CT:
ff102ddb897fa1ab065a1c222b7168d6ac3240e2322a341d29d4f864323c9316 - dc-staff-ai-model / dc_staff_model:
853fdcf9bcc04b2ac6cadbd3e4373dfff8dbc33c1a58cfac6a519632504165c6 - fairfax-staff-ai-guidance / fcps_staff:
dcc831708832f1170da72493551cf82097cbc03da01ce86b65a4fd5875a3918f - illinois-ai-guidance-duty / il_ai_code:
a4af51b38823c0aaa6a8ef64a3765272644b9f61462a66076fde4b73eb0222dc - louisiana-ai-guidance / state_LA:
409b8ddf3cb458c1a67aaaf29b4f3db8b116df0ffb5fe5a56aecd75cf9fe99e3 - montana-ai-guidelines / state_MT:
6e2f25a7dafaa47dd5ee9935679e9dd1bbe483f6a7f76d7dd1f0336f6383eb2c - nyc-ai-2026-27 / q13:
8065ca4c14e4a4c2006240db676bac63657eb202ff7ea09c1c1705a2dacb00f2 - north-dakota-ai-framework / state_ND:
9b9859d88966d282afb9de0f1a10a326bb3dcc3d3d6211a92300e974be74a99f - oklahoma-responsible-technology / ok_sb1734_enrolled:
a2a33057c3fbeaf1f165a6a28500b0438382aa95a54eca6d5cdf638b589baefc - oklahoma-responsible-technology / ok_sb1734:
e28a8f07aaeffb74b21a37e8f0581072943b6b4949110963dc41461094d395b3 - oregon-genai-classrooms / state_OR:
34765d093bea06a616a0bc703a57d3ab1bb5e4a6b6b4df8c8c35c4bfe266ff3a - rhode-island-ai-guidance / state_RI:
eae342d27e6bfc11fd13abc0fa70d3687bb707acbce49a6fdce425a70c709d9e - ftc-coppa-edtech-interpretation / q17:
5337f0c361ed0e5326668cd8b4aa0440d65e2cbe666404ac5dec6ea8cb5e2896 - coppa-2025-amendments / coppa_final:
c08fbb964d1c88ae30a6d92e301a907e0205b41cf0fb1b66e1b7e535259e005a - nist-genai-risk-profile / q18:
2480b19a9531724d5af5a0d6c1e233cd2f9e280cacda8db97f925da298b68b5c - washington-human-centered-ai / state_WA:
d7f4243a69ea3565dc6e3bb2c61254deeab1db186c8b795a09a2d61259ef6ece - west-virginia-ai-guidance / state_WV:
f5861f459aa44a2dfb7d43f5f8c009b1b3449b99ac8abe338d932ffe97d49624 - wyoming-ai-policy-guidance / state_WY:
d46a9d390c63569a5d59abe76ff0d314927ebcc5bd571299b478f223ec58d4ac
Public policy data for this release (JSON) · Collection and coverage notes
Citation
Formative Spaces, “11 current documents address local AI policy development,” AI in Schools: The Visual Edition, research release 2026-10-06-875e416b4116, reviewed October 6, 2026. https://www.formativespaces.com/topics/classroom-ai/visuals/governance-beyond-the-classroom