FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2026
Beyond the headline
FORMATIVESPACES.COM

AI in Schools / The Visual Edition / Story 01

15 of 24 reviewed documents provide guidance

Other records include enacted laws, district policies, a federal regulation, a future law, a proposal and a failed bill.

Formative Spaces · Research reviewed October 6, 2026

15 of 24 reviewed documents provide guidance. Other records include enacted laws, district policies, a federal regulation, a future law, a proposal and a failed bill. These counts cover the 24 documents in the October 6, 2026 release. They describe this research file and cannot measure national policy coverage. Guidance and frameworks. 15 instruments. Advisory models, agency guidance, agency interpretations and voluntary frameworks. Enacted laws. 3 instruments. Three enacted laws. The release withholds an exact effective date where evidence remains unresolved. District policies. 2 instruments. Two district policies or directives. Final regulation. 1 instruments. One final federal regulation with defined operator coverage. Future enacted law. 1 instruments. California AB 1159: K–12 provisions take effect January 1, 2027. Proposed rulemaking. 1 instruments. Florida rule proposal. The release does not establish final adoption of the AI amendment. Failed bill. 1 instruments. Florida SB 1194 died in committee. Each record has one status in this chart. The counts cannot measure national policy coverage or the number of schools that use AI.
Each record has one status in this chart. The counts cannot measure national policy coverage or the number of schools that use AI.

Key findings

Guidance can inform decisions without creating a legal duty. The current explorer contains 21 documents. It lists the future California law, Florida proposal and failed Florida bill separately.

Enactment establishes legislative status. Whether a law applies depends on the responsible actor, scope, provisions and evidence of its effective date.

Animated chart

Eight-second animation

The animation shows the same data as the chart. Use the controls to play, pause or expand the video.

Download and share

Each download includes the Formative Spaces name, brandmark and source context. Share the complete graphic. Include a link to this story. Site terms apply. Original policy sources retain their own rights.

Animations

Landscape MP4 8 seconds · silentVertical MP4 8 seconds · silentAnimated SVG Reduced-motion aware

PNG and MP4 files can be uploaded to social platforms. Available sharing destinations depend on your device and the platform.

Chart data and sources

instruments · reference total 24. These counts cover the 24 documents in the October 6, 2026 release. They describe this research file and cannot measure national policy coverage.

Text and values represented in this visual
Document statusInstrumentsEvidence
Guidance and frameworks15 instruments. Advisory models, agency guidance, agency interpretations and voluntary frameworks.Alaska: Strategic framework for K–12 AICalifornia: Model policy: artificial intelligence in educationConnecticut: Guidance on artificial intelligenceDistrict of Columbia: LEA AI model policy for staff useFairfax County Public Schools: AI guidance for faculty and staffLouisiana: Artificial intelligence in Louisiana schoolsMontana: AI in K–12 education guidelines, version 2North Dakota: K–12 AI guidance frameworkOregon: Generative AI in K–12 classrooms, version 2Rhode Island: AI guidance for local education agenciesUnited States: COPPA policy statement on education technologyUnited States: Generative AI risk management profileWashington: Human-centered AI in schoolsWest Virginia: AI guidance, considerations, and intentions, version 1.2Wyoming: Guidance for AI policy development
Enacted laws3 instruments. Three enacted laws. The release withholds an exact effective date where evidence remains unresolved.California: AI literacy in curriculum-framework reviewIllinois: Statewide school AI guidance dutyOklahoma: Responsible Technology in Schools Act
District policies2 instruments. Two district policies or directives.Chicago Public Schools: Student Acceptable UseNew York City Public Schools: Student-facing AI and screen-time policy
Final regulation1 instruments. One final federal regulation with defined operator coverage.United States: Children’s online privacy: 2025 final amendments
Future enacted law1 instruments. California AB 1159: K–12 provisions take effect January 1, 2027.California: Student-information limits on AI training
Proposed rulemaking1 instruments. Florida rule proposal. The release does not establish final adoption of the AI amendment.Florida: Internet Safety Policy: AI rulemaking
Failed bill1 instruments. Florida SB 1194 died in committee.Florida: AI in K–12 Education: bill history

Each record has one status in this chart. The counts cannot measure national policy coverage or the number of schools that use AI.

Sources & Notes

  1. Strategic framework for K–12 AI — official document

    Alaska Department of Education and Early Development · Source checked October 6, 2026

    PDF page 3

    Reviewed record and version →
  2. Model Policy: Artificial Intelligence In Education - Professional Learning (CA Dept of Education)

    California Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Introduction

    Reviewed record and version →
  3. AB 2876, Chapter 927, September 29, 2024

    California Legislature · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Education Code §33548(d)(1)

    Reviewed record and version →
  4. AB 1159, Chapter 182, September 10, 2026

    California Legislature · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Business and Professions Code §22584(b)(5)

    Reviewed record and version →
  5. Addis Bill Bolstering Student Data Protection Signed Into Law | Official Website - Assemblymember Dawn Addis Representing the 30th California Assembly District

    Office of Assemblymember Dawn Addis · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Official signed-law announcement

    Reviewed record and version →
  6. Student Acceptable Use | Chicago Public Schools

    Chicago Board of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    V. Student Use — Artificial Intelligence

    Reviewed record and version →
  7. Guidance on Artificial Intelligence (AI)search

    Connecticut Commission for Educational Technology · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Official page text

    Reviewed record and version →
  8. LEA AI model policy for staff use — official document

    Office of the State Superintendent of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    PDF page 6 — How to use the model

    Reviewed record and version →
  9. Artificial Intelligence Guidance for FCPS Faculty and Staff | Fairfax County Public Schools

    Fairfax County Public Schools · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Protect Data and Privacy

    Reviewed record and version →
  10. 30988995, 6A-1.0957 - Florida Administrative Rules, Law, Code, Register - FAC, FAR, eRulemaking

    Florida Department of Education / State Board of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Rule development notice 30988995

    Reviewed record and version →
  11. 31301432, 6A-1.0957 - Florida Administrative Rules, Law, Code, Register - FAC, FAR, eRulemaking

    Florida Department of Education / State Board of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Notice 31301432

    Reviewed record and version →
  12. Senate Bill 1194 (2026) - The Florida Senate

    Florida Legislature · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Bill History, March 13, 2026

    Reviewed record and version →
  13. Illinois General Assembly - 105 ILCS 5/ School Code.

    Illinois General Assembly · Source checked October 6, 2026

    105 ILCS 5/2-3.118a(a)

    Reviewed record and version →
  14. Artificial intelligence in Louisiana schools — official document

    Louisiana Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Academic Integrity — AI-Empowered tier

    Reviewed record and version →
  15. Montana AI Guidelines Version 2 FINAL COPY

    Montana Office of Public Instruction · Source checked October 6, 2026

    PDF page 3

    Reviewed record and version →
  16. Guidance on Artificial Intelligence and Screen Time

    New York City Public Schools · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Grades 2K–8: Student-Facing AI Moratorium

    Reviewed record and version →
  17. North Dakota K-12 AI Guidance Framework | North Dakota Department of Public Instruction

    North Dakota Department of Public Instruction · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Official page text

    Reviewed record and version →
  18. Responsible Technology in Schools Act — official document

    Oklahoma Legislature · Source checked October 6, 2026

    §1(E)(3)

    Reviewed record and version →
  19. Bill Information

    Oklahoma Legislature · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Official SB 1734 bill history

    Reviewed record and version →
  20. Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-12 Classrooms

    Oregon Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    PDF page 8

    Reviewed record and version →
  21. AI guidance for local education agencies — official document

    Rhode Island Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    PDF page 5

    Reviewed record and version →
  22. Policy Statement of the Federal Trade Commission on Education Technology

    Federal Trade Commission · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Prohibition Against Mandatory Collection

    Reviewed record and version →
  23. Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 76 (Tuesday, April 22, 2025)

    Federal Trade Commission · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Final regulatory text, §312.10

    Reviewed record and version →
  24. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile

    National Institute of Standards and Technology · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Introduction

    Reviewed record and version →
  25. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in Schools

    Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction · Source checked October 6, 2026

    Official page text

    Reviewed record and version →
  26. AI guidance, considerations, and intentions, version 1.2 — official document

    West Virginia Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    PDF page 14

    Reviewed record and version →
  27. Guidance for AI Policy Development

    Wyoming Department of Education · Source checked October 6, 2026

    PDF page 1

    Reviewed record and version →
Release and evidence identity

Research release 2026-10-06-875e416b4116. Headlines and comparisons use this reviewed release. A changed record requires a new editorial review.

Source projection SHA-256: 9cd6a4996022129f1a1a1060c399a65f12c8f18bc7774fea67463c4d0dd981eb

  • alaska-ai-framework / state_AK: 89430576ac041627992a5273389f9f416233ab2cdd8683b90f0e85b353b76fba
  • california-ai-model-policy / q2: e8cd3d0f08300251a66f19f51dacb8e5df8c52b618182e95e62d4c39d8f9197a
  • california-ab2876 / ca2876_dom: d08021faffadfd585602c6071a65a91e9e32f8bd8e146a36816397f3a8c65cf4
  • california-ab1159 / ca1159_dom: 2a7f90187afadf1fbfeee5fe4cf8c09e8790760104680b88a64d617be6c57873
  • california-ab1159 / ca1159_commencement: 00d91e7c7e86d4128696a24c2f4effd69a6790a1ddecc43d7c3e1087f300fd88
  • chicago-student-acceptable-use / q14: 0bc94b24b21ddd1237c6355021901d774f301ae730fa81b69d2ec033789a881d
  • connecticut-ai-guidance / state_CT: ff102ddb897fa1ab065a1c222b7168d6ac3240e2322a341d29d4f864323c9316
  • dc-staff-ai-model / dc_staff_model: 853fdcf9bcc04b2ac6cadbd3e4373dfff8dbc33c1a58cfac6a519632504165c6
  • fairfax-staff-ai-guidance / fcps_staff: dcc831708832f1170da72493551cf82097cbc03da01ce86b65a4fd5875a3918f
  • florida-internet-safety-rulemaking / q4: 6eab22c8e6ce5b432c141cd621ac0e6e3f3383fb386c237e8a36db56f709fac6
  • florida-internet-safety-rulemaking / q5: c0e0c9aa8286417d3494d8f5a1d6004fe7b6e63d60f688681c29e4985dd60848
  • florida-sb1194-2026 / q7: 8302343b3e41534f469afd5022b07810c824b1730b8bf83d060f9b7a21dbd991
  • illinois-ai-guidance-duty / il_ai_code: a4af51b38823c0aaa6a8ef64a3765272644b9f61462a66076fde4b73eb0222dc
  • louisiana-ai-guidance / state_LA: 409b8ddf3cb458c1a67aaaf29b4f3db8b116df0ffb5fe5a56aecd75cf9fe99e3
  • montana-ai-guidelines / state_MT: 6e2f25a7dafaa47dd5ee9935679e9dd1bbe483f6a7f76d7dd1f0336f6383eb2c
  • nyc-ai-2026-27 / q13: 8065ca4c14e4a4c2006240db676bac63657eb202ff7ea09c1c1705a2dacb00f2
  • north-dakota-ai-framework / state_ND: 9b9859d88966d282afb9de0f1a10a326bb3dcc3d3d6211a92300e974be74a99f
  • oklahoma-responsible-technology / ok_sb1734_enrolled: a2a33057c3fbeaf1f165a6a28500b0438382aa95a54eca6d5cdf638b589baefc
  • oklahoma-responsible-technology / ok_sb1734: e28a8f07aaeffb74b21a37e8f0581072943b6b4949110963dc41461094d395b3
  • oregon-genai-classrooms / state_OR: 34765d093bea06a616a0bc703a57d3ab1bb5e4a6b6b4df8c8c35c4bfe266ff3a
  • rhode-island-ai-guidance / state_RI: eae342d27e6bfc11fd13abc0fa70d3687bb707acbce49a6fdce425a70c709d9e
  • ftc-coppa-edtech-interpretation / q17: 5337f0c361ed0e5326668cd8b4aa0440d65e2cbe666404ac5dec6ea8cb5e2896
  • coppa-2025-amendments / coppa_final: c08fbb964d1c88ae30a6d92e301a907e0205b41cf0fb1b66e1b7e535259e005a
  • nist-genai-risk-profile / q18: 2480b19a9531724d5af5a0d6c1e233cd2f9e280cacda8db97f925da298b68b5c
  • washington-human-centered-ai / state_WA: d7f4243a69ea3565dc6e3bb2c61254deeab1db186c8b795a09a2d61259ef6ece
  • west-virginia-ai-guidance / state_WV: f5861f459aa44a2dfb7d43f5f8c009b1b3449b99ac8abe338d932ffe97d49624
  • wyoming-ai-policy-guidance / state_WY: d46a9d390c63569a5d59abe76ff0d314927ebcc5bd571299b478f223ec58d4ac

Public policy data for this release (JSON) · Collection and coverage notes

Citation

Formative Spaces, “15 of 24 reviewed documents provide guidance,” AI in Schools: The Visual Edition, research release 2026-10-06-875e416b4116, reviewed October 6, 2026. https://www.formativespaces.com/topics/classroom-ai/visuals/read-the-status-first